The subject of boys reading is close to my heart, primarily because as a youngster coming up, I watched my brother’s painful struggles learning to read. Dad sat up with him every night - Dad read one page, my brother another and so on. I empathised with my brother. Books and the joy of reading formed the background to my childhood experience. It seemed such a shame to me that he missed out.
With my own three boys, teaching them to read, and sharing the love of reading with them has been a top priority.
I remember hearing a story about Frana Cardno,
mayor of Southland District Council in New Zealand. When Frana first
lobbied for a library in her area, apparently the response from the “mainly macho community where most decisions were made over a beer in the Working Men’s Club”, was this classic line: “What do you need books for?”
I like to think we've come a long way since the '70's but then I am an optimist.
The research shows we still have a way to go. In a post by Tricia Lowther, recently, Lowther wrote, The 2012 report by
the Boys Reading Commission, (BRC), compiled by the National Literacy Trust,
reports that at age seven, there’s a gender gap of 7 percentage points in the
proportion of pupils reaching the expected level in reading, and the numbers
rise slightly with age.
So, how do we get boys to read? And feel good about it? In
recent times, some folks in marketing and advertising have tried to
encourage boys by coming up with the idea to label books for ‘boys’ or ‘girls’.
But I’m not sure segregating titles would make any difference. It's not getting to the root of the problem.
In the ensuing backlash to the gender marketing, The Let
Books Be Books campaign asks children’s publishers to take the ‘Boys’ and
‘Girls’ labels off books. Reminder: when we say "Books for
boys," we set a default as books and reading are girl activities. We
reinforce social expectations. As journalist and children’s author Bel Mooney said in
a radio discussion on marketing books as ‘boys’ or ‘girls’; “The imagination does not have
a gender.”
When
my middle son, Samuel, was born with Down Syndrome, my brother-in-law said that the
British Research Association had come out with findings that suggested the more
you stimulated a baby’s senses from 0-3 years old, the greater the child’s
intelligence. I gathered a big box full of different
sensory devices for Sam: shells, feathers, pumice, stones, wood, and metal. I
engaged him in water play, sandpits, gardening, painting, playdough, clay
modelling, listening to music, and watching educational videos. I consistently worked to stimulate his senses.
Most of my energy though went into reading to him. Sam and I visited the
library every week, when I’d allow him free reign to choose as many books
as he liked (up to the limit of 30). Then I would read the enormous pile to him
every single day until we went back to the library for a new pile. When my
brother-in-law met Sam again, at eleven months old, my BIL said, “He’s changed.
The light has come on in his eyes.” And he was right.
To my delight,
Sam has become an avid reader. He was first in his class to read independently,
and despite there being three age levels in his room, Sam is the best
reader in class.
What do you need books for? How about to switch on the
light in a disabled boy’s eyes, a singular event that has altered the course of
his education for the better, therefore his whole life.
“There clearly is a myth about boys and
reading as so many people seem to think that the gender gap in reading is
bigger than it is, but research shows that the number one factor that
determines your reading ability is how often your parents read out loud to you
and the number of books in your house.” ~ Jennifer Dyer
What do we need books for? What's the best way to encourage boys to read? What do you think?
Keep reading!
Till next time,
Yvette K. Carol